Final Look

Post a reply


This question is a means of preventing automated form submissions by spambots.
Smilies
:D :) :( :o :shock: :? 8) :lol: :x :P :oops: :cry: :evil: :twisted: :roll: :wink: :!: :?: :idea: :arrow: :| :mrgreen:

BBCode is ON
[img] is ON
[url] is ON
Smilies are ON

Topic review
   

If you wish to attach one or more files enter the details below.

Maximum filesize per attachment: 25 MiB.

Expand view Topic review: Final Look

by francois » Sun Mar 14, 2010 2:20 pm

Neotrope wrote:it's about what John wanted to create...
Neotrope expressed really well what probably all Solaris buyers think. Besides the technical aspect of the Solaris, and the exclusivity that comes with it, part of the purchase decision for me was also to support somebody trying to bring his vision to market. And, let's face it, bringing to market something like the Solaris is not about making money, although I hope John will get some reward out of this venture. That in my book deserves not only respect but also support, and I'm happy to amongst those who can do so.

by nachtsmeer » Wed Feb 03, 2010 3:15 pm

I second what John says :D

,,, eloquently put

,,, the plug-in sounds fabulous
,,, so the hardware baby should REALLII knock your sox off

by John Bowen » Wed Feb 03, 2010 9:25 am

Chris,
Wow! Thanks for expressing exactly what I feel and hope for the Solaris - that was a perfect description, and it made me very glad that you were able to articulate it so well! It's also what so many of the pre-order customers have expressed to me privately (though maybe not as eloquently).

Thank you all for your support and participation in this project - it wouldn't have happened without it!

Sincerely,
John B.

by Neotrope » Wed Feb 03, 2010 9:11 am

synthman1 wrote:Hello Everyone!


I do question some of the design implementation decisions and wonder if there should is a more practical approach to the interface implementation design and layout that would have passed along some cost savings to potential users and consumers though. $4000 is a lot of coin for a synth. Dano
Dano,
keep in mind that most of us buying this (have already bought) are looking for something DIFFERENT than what you can get with a Nord Wave, Prophet 08, Korg M3, etc. Or from a software-only plug-in. Many of us own vintage gear, many of us are not "rich" but successful, and many of us have a variety of things to make noise, but are always interested in somebody else's "vision" of how to make noise from electrical equipment, both noise and music, art and soul, etc. What John has brought to market is *his* vision of how to do that, based on his storied past in the industry, and trying to do something in a new way. Much like a custom suit, it costs more to build 100 of something, than mass produce it like Alesis can do with their own chip foundry (that's why the Andromeda doesn't cost $7K, which it would normally).

For most of us, the feedback to multiple screens on board, the multiple player options (mod wheels, ribbon -and- joystick, all perform different functions in context to the sound and playing style), and the "feedback" of different modules replicate the feedback visually of traditional modular synths where you could "see" a patch cable running from a LFO to a filter or whatever. Most of us decry the concept of a single window, 50 sub menus, as that has been commonplace for nearly two decades. Having multiple "scribble strips" for the user interface is part of its selling points, and NOT a minus for its design or for usability.

We're looking for something that makes sound, but makes that process more fun, intuitive and different than what we already have, or have used before; something to inspire us to create art, not simply admire it. The Solaris will never be competing with Dave Smith's Prophet 08, and it's not competing with any ROMplers (ie., Korg M3, Roland G, Yamaha Motif).

Certainly it's not intended to keep people out of the club based on price, but for this kind of product is simply has inherent costs to deliver the developers vision -- to remove things to make it half the selling price, would make it less than what it is and be too simliar to what's already out there.

Just as there is a market for the Lexus over the matching Toyota model (Camry vs. ES350), or Coby beef over the supermarket special steaks, or a $5 pen vs. the 10 for $1 at Staples, it's not about class or income or how much is in the bank. For this product, it's about what John wanted to create, what he saw in his mind, how he wanted to have a real world interface to his sound engine, and by making such an interface he was able to enhance his original Solaris software engine into further territory directly because of all the interface choices on the keyboard.

All input is valuable and John reads it all, as do many of us, but please understand that the VALUE to the people buying this has to do with what it does that all the rest of the gear out there does not!

Peace and well wishes.

by BF » Wed Feb 03, 2010 5:47 am

I hear the dark version has more presence in the bottom end.

by Carbon111 » Tue Feb 02, 2010 11:37 am

Cool beans, John! The update is appreciated.

The lighter one looks better anyway...probably sounds better too. :lol:

by John Bowen » Tue Feb 02, 2010 11:02 am

John Bowen wrote:Yes, Carbon111 is correct - the Limited Edition silkscreen is only the first 50 units....the only other difference is my signature silkscreened on the back panel. The internals - features, functions, etc., - are all the same as the regular production unit planned. We're not sure if we will continue with the lighter colored panel as well - there's only been 17 ordered out of the first 50.
-john b.
Update - we will continue to offer both light and dark color for the case options. Eventually it may be that one of the two will become a "special order" situation, where we would have to get enough orders of a certain color before it's worthwhile financially to have a group made.
-john b.

by John Bowen » Wed Feb 04, 2009 8:52 am

ThreeFingersOfLove wrote:Also, is there a possibility to purchase the Solaris from somewhere in Europe?
Yannis,
What we are doing is taking pre-orders from my Web site directly. European customers will have their units shipped directly to them from Germany. Once the online orders have all been fulfilled, we will start to get units to select dealers around the world. Buying directly from the Web site offers you a two week 'try-out' of the product, with a money back guarantee. This is not possible for units that are purchased through a dealer.

John B.

by John Bowen » Wed Feb 04, 2009 8:47 am

Yes, Carbon111 is correct - the Limited Edition silkscreen is only the first 50 units....the only other difference is my signature silkscreened on the back panel. The internals - features, functions, etc., - are all the same as the regular production unit planned. We're not sure if we will continue with the lighter colored panel as well - there's only been 17 ordered out of the first 50.
-john b.

by Carbon111 » Wed Feb 04, 2009 8:14 am

As far as I know, the "limited editions" are just the preorders - they will be signed by John and are available in the light color and the dark color.

The standard production model will be the same as the darker model but without the "limited edition" silkscreen and no signature.

by ThreeFingersOfLove » Wed Feb 04, 2009 3:56 am

John,

in NAMM 2009 there were two versions of the Solaris. From what I can tell of the photos they said "Limited edition". Will both of these be available for purchase or the mass-produced version will be different?

Also, is there a possibility to purchase the Solaris from somewhere in Europe?

Regards,
Yannis

by seamonkey » Fri Jan 30, 2009 4:45 am

Thanks John, I would like to apologize. Later in the evening I realized this could've been done by private email. :(

Thank you for your thoughts richard. :)

by RichardKC6 » Fri Jan 30, 2009 2:41 am

seamonkey wrote:This would of course only be available for the Limited Edition preorder customers.
Surely the process of productionising the synth would allow refinements to the mechanical engineering.

IME, if you want screwless end-cheeks, you need to support the top internally - so what would be essentially a 2-dimensional folded top panel becomes a complex 3D object. Then you have to ensure those supports don't catch on any internal components, and you have to secure them to the pressing (which in a crude way, means screws on the front, in a non-crude way means glue - modern glues can hold a car together so I'm sure a synth would be fine - or welding, which means finishing the surface above).

A folded panel can be supported either with thicker wooden end cheeks screwed through the top, which usually means you're screwing into wood (which unless you want to get really fussy and put threaded bushings in) and has a finite number of times before the attachments are weak, or you can put screws through into welded nuts or even just a threaded section of the panel from the side, which tensions the flat panel and requires minimal hardware.

Also, what I'm not considering is that some of these approaches may be covered by patents. Seems unlikely, but not impossible.

Whilst it's a drag from a service point of view, I like using small, anodized hex capped bolts - if I'm going to have visible screws, I'll make sure they look nice.

From the position of those screws, either the case is folded a long way in, or they're attaching to an internal support, in which case I'd use very, very thin screws, very thin bushings, and screw them on from the inside.

But John's suggesting that they affect the structure.

The Virus Indigo 2 has no visible screws, but the end cheeks are attached from below and have no structural role in the construction of this 37-key model (they also make fitting the keyboard a bit tricky, as the cosmetic front of the key has to go in front of a screw and bolt whilst the AT strip has to go into cutout in the end cheek - very clever). The 61 key models have a different approach.

Either way, I'm sure John & his team have considered all of the ways they could attach this. I think the screws look alright but they are quite visible on the lighter wood. What is unusual is the case "completeness" from front to back with the mod wheels, without a break.

by John Bowen » Thu Jan 29, 2009 4:43 pm

Yes, we had to change the way the side panels are attached, which required adding the screw holes. I'm afraid there's no possibility to have it without the holes, although I suppose one could manage some kind of 'covering' over each hole if it were done correctly.
I agree, the previous design was nicer - but just not a practical approach to the construction of the case, especially where stability was concerned.
-john b.

by seamonkey » Thu Jan 29, 2009 4:16 pm

John I have a question regarding the wood side panels. In the early prototype how were you attaching the wood panels to the side of Solaris?
The reason I ask this is in looking at the pictures James took at WNAMM09, one in particular http://www.carbon111.com/solaris/namm09/P1010922.jpg shows the panels attached with screws. To be truthful I find it rather distracting, I understand the reasons for this but the wood panels without the screws in the prototype looked beautiful and highlighted the elegant design of Solaris.

If this is a rather simple process for the user to attach non drilled woodpanels I would much rather do it myself if possible. This would of course only be available for the Limited Edition preorder customers.

Top