Solaris future questions.

Discuss John Bowen Synths - Solaris
Post Reply
robinkle
Posts: 4
Joined: Fri Apr 08, 2011 6:26 am
Contact:

Solaris future questions.

Post by robinkle » Wed Apr 04, 2018 2:35 am

I've spent some time reading the Forum, and I'm very excited. I haven't made a post since 2014. I haven't purchased a Solaris yet, due to obvious financial restrictions :(, though it seems be be solved within a year. I've always wanted a Solaris. Though, I do have some questions regarding the near future of Solaris:

What interests me at the moment on the hardware side is the new mainboard, using next gen SHARC DSP's. I believe I''ve read somewhere that the original mainboard had connectors for voice expansion. I wonder if the new mainboard would feature support for voice expansion as well and if there are plans to offer an internal voice expansion on a later date? I would be interested in that.

On the software side, I like the idea of paying extra for the OS v.2. I would like to see phase modulation (Preferably a DX7 style operator as an Oscillator), and multitimbrality.

I want to thank John for being so awesome and transparent in relation to the community.

John Bowen
Site Admin
Posts: 1755
Joined: Sat Apr 07, 2007 3:00 am

Re: Solaris future questions.

Post by John Bowen » Thu Apr 05, 2018 9:32 am

Hi Robin,

Thanks for your questions. First, I can tell you that the original main board never had connectors for voice expansion, and we are still using that board for production. The new main board I spoke of also does not have voice expansion connectors. We were just hoping that the more powerful SHARCs would give us a few more voices, but development of the new board is stalled until the board designer has some free time from his regular day job to work on migrating the code to the new board. (During the time he worked on the new board, we did discuss the idea of a DSP expansion path, but I think in the end he said it wasn’t really practical.)

I also would like to have a DX7 style FM/PM structure, as it was planned to have that in the very beginning. We will see what comes...

John B.

robinkle
Posts: 4
Joined: Fri Apr 08, 2011 6:26 am
Contact:

Re: Solaris future questions.

Post by robinkle » Thu Apr 05, 2018 9:53 am

John Bowen wrote:
Thu Apr 05, 2018 9:32 am
Hi Robin,

Thanks for your questions. First, I can tell you that the original main board never had connectors for voice expansion, and we are still using that board for production. The new main board I spoke of also does not have voice expansion connectors. We were just hoping that the more powerful SHARCs would give us a few more voices, but development of the new board is stalled until the board designer has some free time from his regular day job to work on migrating the code to the new board. (During the time he worked on the new board, we did discuss the idea of a DSP expansion path, but I think in the end he said it wasn’t really practical.)

I also would like to have a DX7 style FM/PM structure, as it was planned to have that in the very beginning. We will see what comes...

John B.
Thank you John. :)

Hein Eken
Posts: 39
Joined: Thu Sep 06, 2012 10:45 am

Re: Solaris future questions.

Post by Hein Eken » Fri Apr 06, 2018 5:42 pm

John Bowen wrote:
Thu Apr 05, 2018 9:32 am
... but development of the new board is stalled until the board designer has some free time from his regular day job to work on migrating the code to the new board. ...

John B.
Wiil we see that "new board" in the 1HU Solaris expander ?

:)

Hein

John Bowen
Site Admin
Posts: 1755
Joined: Sat Apr 07, 2007 3:00 am

Re: Solaris future questions.

Post by John Bowen » Fri Apr 06, 2018 5:59 pm

Nope.

Hein Eken
Posts: 39
Joined: Thu Sep 06, 2012 10:45 am

Re: Solaris future questions.

Post by Hein Eken » Fri Apr 06, 2018 6:15 pm

John Bowen wrote:
Fri Apr 06, 2018 5:59 pm
Nope.
thx,- what´s the advantage of a/ the new board at all ?

H.

John Bowen
Site Admin
Posts: 1755
Joined: Sat Apr 07, 2007 3:00 am

Re: Solaris future questions.

Post by John Bowen » Fri Apr 06, 2018 10:29 pm

What happens as the years go by, some parts become no longer available through normal channels, and you have to find them on the ‘after market’, where the prices become ridiculously high in most cases. That has been the case for the current main board, and my costs have increased significantly because of this. An updated board allows one to purchase parts at regular prices.

Of course, I hope that the faster DSPs will give us an improvement in the number of voices, but in any case, it is designed to be backwards compatible, and would be an easy update for current owners to do. However, I have to say, if people are going to wait for the new main board, you are in for a really long wait!

Hook
Posts: 16
Joined: Sat Apr 01, 2017 11:22 am

Re: Solaris future questions.

Post by Hook » Sat Apr 07, 2018 3:32 pm

With the industry moving towards more ARM -- better tools, cheaper, better price/performance -- like the H9000 and Quantum, how much work would it be to move the existing code onto an ARM setup vs. trying to continue down the SHARC path? There would be other advantages too such as a larger base of programmers familiar with the tools.

John Bowen
Site Admin
Posts: 1755
Joined: Sat Apr 07, 2007 3:00 am

Re: Solaris future questions.

Post by John Bowen » Mon Apr 09, 2018 1:41 pm

Hook wrote:
Sat Apr 07, 2018 3:32 pm
With the industry moving towards more ARM -- better tools, cheaper, better price/performance -- like the H9000 and Quantum, how much work would it be to move the existing code onto an ARM setup vs. trying to continue down the SHARC path? There would be other advantages too such as a larger base of programmers familiar with the tools.
Yes, I have heard from others about this idea...but I have no idea of the complexity or even possibility. Also, who would do this? It sounds like an expensive and difficult task.

david
Posts: 30
Joined: Mon Oct 17, 2016 3:55 pm

Re: Solaris future questions.

Post by david » Sun Apr 15, 2018 7:14 pm

John Bowen wrote:
Mon Apr 09, 2018 1:41 pm
Hook wrote:
Sat Apr 07, 2018 3:32 pm
With the industry moving towards more ARM -- better tools, cheaper, better price/performance -- like the H9000 and Quantum, how much work would it be to move the existing code onto an ARM setup vs. trying to continue down the SHARC path? There would be other advantages too such as a larger base of programmers familiar with the tools.
Yes, I have heard from others about this idea...but I have no idea of the complexity or even possibility. Also, who would do this? It sounds like an expensive and difficult task.
I would love drop in next-gen LCD or OLED screens but it’s probably not economical for just a cosmetic upgrade.

Hook
Posts: 16
Joined: Sat Apr 01, 2017 11:22 am

Re: Solaris future questions.

Post by Hook » Mon Apr 16, 2018 9:55 am

John Bowen wrote:
Mon Apr 09, 2018 1:41 pm
Hook wrote:
Sat Apr 07, 2018 3:32 pm
With the industry moving towards more ARM -- better tools, cheaper, better price/performance -- like the H9000 and Quantum, how much work would it be to move the existing code onto an ARM setup vs. trying to continue down the SHARC path? There would be other advantages too such as a larger base of programmers familiar with the tools.
Yes, I have heard from others about this idea...but I have no idea of the complexity or even possibility. Also, who would do this? It sounds like an expensive and difficult task.
Without understanding the code it's hard to say. But this really brings up a greater existential question (beyond the scope of this thread) of where is the Solaris heading if essentially the HW and SW architectures are 'frozen'? There's a reason that the Virus hasn't been updated in 9 years (!), and I'm guessing that the cost of porting to a new architecture just isn't worthwhile.

I'd love to get an understanding of the future of the Solaris. I love mine, but there are a lot of things I'd like to see in a future rev that likely won't be possible if beholden to incremental adjustments to the existing architecture.

John Bowen
Site Admin
Posts: 1755
Joined: Sat Apr 07, 2007 3:00 am

Re: Solaris future questions.

Post by John Bowen » Mon Apr 16, 2018 10:27 am

Hook wrote:
Mon Apr 16, 2018 9:55 am
I'd love to get an understanding of the future of the Solaris. I love mine, but there are a lot of things I'd like to see in a future rev that likely won't be possible if beholden to incremental adjustments to the existing architecture.
Brian - would you be willing to list these things, and send them to me?

Hook
Posts: 16
Joined: Sat Apr 01, 2017 11:22 am

Re: Solaris future questions.

Post by Hook » Mon Apr 16, 2018 5:38 pm

Sure. Feel free to email me at brianhook@gmail.com, happy to chat or if you’re in Seattle grab coffee some time.

Post Reply