Solaris review - Keyboard Jan 2012

Discuss John Bowen Synths - Solaris
francois
Posts: 90
Joined: Wed Jul 16, 2008 2:18 am
Location: UK, Midlands
Contact:

Solaris review - Keyboard Jan 2012

Post by francois »

"Sit Solaris vobiscum"
jaykeel
Posts: 71
Joined: Thu Jan 07, 2010 5:53 am
Contact:

Re: Solaris review - Keyboard Jan 2012

Post by jaykeel »

Congratulations JB, on an absolutely glowing review. Well deserved.
Last edited by jaykeel on Thu Dec 22, 2011 6:13 am, edited 1 time in total.
marzzz
Posts: 221
Joined: Mon Dec 01, 2008 8:07 pm
Contact:

Re: Solaris review - Keyboard Jan 2012

Post by marzzz »

Great review, and the few "cons" the reviewer mentioned are all due to be corrected in time. Double polyphony via OS update? "Kewl!"
HUROLURA
Posts: 101
Joined: Mon May 07, 2007 12:21 am
Location: France
Contact:

Re: Solaris review - Keyboard Jan 2012

Post by HUROLURA »

As a monotimbral synth I guess the SOLARIS would have met the 16 notes polyphony max from the scope synths ...
And by the way most of us only have 10 fingers, no ? :mrgreen:

The multipart should be the main next update feature, espaecially if it allow raising the max polyphony from 10 to 20 notes ...

Are some of the 6 DSP unused for now John ?
CheerZ
John Bowen
Site Admin
Posts: 2002
Joined: Sat Apr 07, 2007 3:00 am
Contact:

Re: Solaris review - Keyboard Jan 2012

Post by John Bowen »

HUROLURA wrote:Are some of the 6 DSP unused for now John ?
They are all being used, 5 for the voice production, and 1 for the Master Effects and other housekeeping issues.

Having a Mulltitimbre Mode doesn’t have anything to do with an increase of polyphony. The plan was there all along to have a 4-part Multimode, but we had to finish the other synth parts first, and this just would have added another long delay, because it’s a bit more complicated to code.
Increasing the polyphony has to do with optimizing the DSP allocation, which is why there is an OFF position in the Oscillator Type. All my plug-ins do this - if an object is not being used, then it is not included in the DSP calculation. This has not been implemented in the current OS yet, and so it’s something that needs to be reviewed, to see if doing so would gain us more polyphony in those presets that don’t use all 4 oscs, for example. (This means the polyphony would be a variable, not a fixed number).

john b.
HUROLURA
Posts: 101
Joined: Mon May 07, 2007 12:21 am
Location: France
Contact:

Re: Solaris review - Keyboard Jan 2012

Post by HUROLURA »

Understood, so this would mean the polyphony could finally be in the minimum 10 voices up to 20 (or any to be determined figure) depending on the preset used for each instrument ... similar to what is possible on scope or on other competitor devices.
CheerZ
John Bowen
Site Admin
Posts: 2002
Joined: Sat Apr 07, 2007 3:00 am
Contact:

Re: Solaris review - Keyboard Jan 2012

Post by John Bowen »

Yeah, the polyphony has to be a multiple of 5, so, 10, 15, or possibly 20 notes of polyphony would be the thing.
synthwalker
Posts: 71
Joined: Sun Apr 10, 2011 3:16 am
Location: France
Contact:

Re: Solaris review - Keyboard Jan 2012

Post by synthwalker »

So this means each of the 5 DSP fires 2 voices (or more in the future) with static voice allocation ? If so will multimode have full dynamic allocation between parts ? Anyway 4 parts multimode should be enough to me.
John Bowen
Site Admin
Posts: 2002
Joined: Sat Apr 07, 2007 3:00 am
Contact:

Re: Solaris review - Keyboard Jan 2012

Post by John Bowen »

I’m not sure about the voice allocation. I would prefer to have it assignable in MultiMode, but I don’t know what the engineers have in mind.

john b.
synthwalker
Posts: 71
Joined: Sun Apr 10, 2011 3:16 am
Location: France
Contact:

Re: Solaris review - Keyboard Jan 2012

Post by synthwalker »

John Bowen wrote:I don’t know what the engineers have in mind.
Nobody ever knows what engineers have in mind, that's why you have to decide for them :wink:
HUROLURA
Posts: 101
Joined: Mon May 07, 2007 12:21 am
Location: France
Contact:

Re: Solaris review - Keyboard Jan 2012

Post by HUROLURA »

synthwalker wrote:
John Bowen wrote:I don’t know what the engineers have in mind.
Nobody ever knows what engineers have in mind, that's why you have to decide for them :wink:
Then, they'll listen carefully to what YOU tell them ...
... and in the end do what THEY want ... :wink:
CheerZ
Neutron
Posts: 28
Joined: Fri Nov 19, 2010 7:44 pm
Contact:

Re: Solaris review - Keyboard Jan 2012

Post by Neutron »

500kHz LFOs?
I think that might be a typo.
John Bowen
Site Admin
Posts: 2002
Joined: Sat Apr 07, 2007 3:00 am
Contact:

Re: Solaris review - Keyboard Jan 2012

Post by John Bowen »

Oops! Guess I missed that in the preview copy they sent me....oh my!

Yes, currently it’s a 500 Hz upper limit for the LFOs. (Maybe we should change that to be 500kHz? :-) )
Neutron
Posts: 28
Joined: Fri Nov 19, 2010 7:44 pm
Contact:

Re: Solaris review - Keyboard Jan 2012

Post by Neutron »

yes that will be perfect for the much ignored Chiropteran audience :mrgreen:
cornutt
Posts: 26
Joined: Fri Dec 07, 2007 11:42 am
Location: Huntsville, AL USA
Contact:

Re: Solaris review - Keyboard Jan 2012

Post by cornutt »

HUROLURA wrote:As a monotimbral synth I guess the SOLARIS would have met the 16 notes polyphony max from the scope synths ...
And by the way most of us only have 10 fingers, no ? :mrgreen:
Well, if you use your arm... :lol:
Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Ahrefs [Bot] and 34 guests