Modulation Sources List Messed Up in v1.4

Moderator: Solaris Moderators

Post Reply
cLoudForest
Posts: 6
Joined: Fri Aug 08, 2014 11:25 am

Modulation Sources List Messed Up in v1.4

Post by cLoudForest » Sun Dec 17, 2017 8:37 am

Hi,

Unfortunately, there seems to be a bug introduced in v1.4 that causes the modulation sources list to lose some of the entries. For example, OSC 1-3 are missing even though OSC 4 is there. There seem to be a number of sources that just have --- as their names too. Reverted to v1.3.1 and the missing entries were back again.

Thanks.

John Bowen
Site Admin
Posts: 1672
Joined: Sat Apr 07, 2007 3:00 am

Re: Modulation Sources List Messed Up in v1.4

Post by John Bowen » Sun Dec 17, 2017 11:03 am

Thanks for posting! Jim has found the break, and will have it fixed soon. I guess we will have v1.4.1 a bit sooner than I thought!

Octupole
Posts: 17
Joined: Mon Oct 31, 2011 10:47 am

Re: Modulation Sources List Messed Up in v1.4

Post by Octupole » Fri Dec 22, 2017 1:33 pm

Currently the file name and version is "solarisos_v1.4.0.1.raw.zip", and the OS file is dated Dec 18th 2017 - so in this version the problem is already fixed?

minorguy
Posts: 67
Joined: Fri Dec 05, 2014 12:09 pm
Location: San Jose, CA, USA

Re: Modulation Sources List Messed Up in v1.4

Post by minorguy » Fri Dec 22, 2017 2:51 pm

Yes, this is fixed. John decided to call it 1.4.0.1 instead of 1.4.1.

Edit: And thanks for your help cLoudForest!
Last edited by minorguy on Fri Dec 22, 2017 5:33 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Solaris #249

Octupole
Posts: 17
Joined: Mon Oct 31, 2011 10:47 am

Re: Modulation Sources List Messed Up in v1.4

Post by Octupole » Fri Dec 22, 2017 3:25 pm

Thanks a lot :-) :) :-)

John Bowen
Site Admin
Posts: 1672
Joined: Sat Apr 07, 2007 3:00 am

Re: Modulation Sources List Messed Up in v1.4

Post by John Bowen » Fri Dec 22, 2017 5:35 pm

Yes, sorry about the confusion. I wanted to differentiate v1.4.0 and the version with the fix, but still didn’t feel it warranted a full bump to v1.4.1. We’d like to wait to see if there are any other significant problems for users before we do that.

John B.

Post Reply