Simple Audio Examples

Post a reply


This question is a means of preventing automated form submissions by spambots.
Smilies
:D :) :( :o :shock: :? 8) :lol: :x :P :oops: :cry: :evil: :twisted: :roll: :wink: :!: :?: :idea: :arrow: :| :mrgreen:
BBCode is ON
[img] is ON
[url] is ON
Smilies are ON
Topic review
   

If you wish to attach one or more files enter the details below.

Maximum filesize per attachment: 25 MiB.

Expand view Topic review: Simple Audio Examples

by stardust » Mon Oct 13, 2008 11:35 am

thamls John. We are close to the birth.

by John Bowen » Sat Oct 11, 2008 11:12 pm

I've posted notes and links of 2 other pieces of music created by carbon111 over in the Music/examples section:

viewtopic.php?t=456

scroll to the bottom for the links.

john b.

by seamonkey » Wed Oct 08, 2008 3:18 am

To satiate my Solaris yearnings I revisited the Delamar video from Messe '08 yesterday, and I must say the power and texture of Solaris blew me away all over again. The example of the rotor was also great to hear.

B787 I'm looking forward to hear your work using Solaris as well as many of the many talented musicians who have decided to purchase this wonderful synthesizer. :D

by B787 » Tue Oct 07, 2008 1:51 pm

Jb

Great tune, I really like the percussive possibilities, the filter sweeping soudn is awesome ( Genelic Monitor bias :lol: ) . I know you're making it for the love of it and synth music (the $$$ will come too-rewards for hard work, we're adults here :wink: ), but i think this is going to be hard to beat. The depth is amazing. Well let me state this, when I get mine, I will program for film scores/pads/dreamscapes/basses (for my own studio work)etc.....if the facilities are in place they will be posted on this site for users to enjoy and use. Sleepless nights are here again. 8)

cheers

by John Bowen » Tue Oct 07, 2008 12:41 pm

Have you had a listen to redmartian's short song he put together using the Solaris proto?

http://redmartian.com/solaris/solaris1.mp3

I took the synth over to his studio to do some comparison recordings with some Prophets (Rev 1/2 and Rev 3), and ended up leaving the proto with him for a few days. Since I don't have any kind of sequencing software, it was nice to hear a more complete 'tune'.

Once the initial users have their units, I hope there will be some more extensive demos for everyone to hear.

-john b.

by B787 » Tue Oct 07, 2008 9:15 am

JB

When can we expect newer sound somples to wet our palettes more ? I really enjoyed the tube/comb filter sounds with the noise as source going into the filter w/ resonance....great job 8)

by Howard » Thu Aug 07, 2008 1:39 pm

stardust wrote:This is antitune is it ? ;)
Yes.

by stardust » Thu Aug 07, 2008 12:29 pm

This is antitune is it ? ;)

by Howard » Wed Aug 06, 2008 11:45 pm

John Bowen wrote:...not strictly an emulation of a CEM filter (it's not in there yet), but the main MultiMode filter in Lowpass 4 pole (24 dB slope) mode. I just wanted to call it that for the test's sake. 8)
:D Had me fooled! Will the CEMulation sound different enough to warrant developing it?

BTW: I'm looking forward to any news about that SLOP parameter (because I think it might make a huge difference to the "sound")

by John Bowen » Wed Aug 06, 2008 11:26 pm

Yes, well....that is the easy giveaway :D

Also...re: Solaris - this is not strictly an emulation of a CEM filter (it's not in there yet), but the main MultiMode filter in Lowpass 4 pole (24 dB slope) mode.
I just wanted to call it that for the test's sake. 8)

So...no 'slop' parameter in the Solaris tuning yet...and I hit the Tune button on my P5 numerous times!! Next time I'll have to be a lot more careful...

-jb

p.s. re: resonance - yeah, I should have spent more time on it to match them

by Howard » Wed Aug 06, 2008 11:12 pm

How to beat 50:50? :idea: The one that doesn't have a detuned voice is Solaris.
BTW: Resonance seems to be slightly higher in #2 (judging by the "bumps" when cutoff goes low)

by John Bowen » Wed Aug 06, 2008 10:38 pm

Hi All:

Another little test - this time, you have a 50/50 chance guessing which is which, since there's only 2 examples. :-)
One of these is the Solaris, and the other is a Rev3 Prophet 5.

CEM 1
CEM 2
Here's both of the files, one in each ear:
CEMs together

by John Bowen » Tue Jul 29, 2008 11:51 am

Well, we will be using category filters (2 or 3 types for each preset) to help organize things in the synth. I'm not sure as to how the Editor/Librarian will look, but of course, there has to be something for that as well (especially to load user samples or wavetables).

-jb

by stardust » Tue Jul 29, 2008 11:46 am

999 is a lot.
Sounds like a good librarian is needed ;)

by seamonkey » Tue Jul 29, 2008 10:30 am

999? wow, that's quite a bit(more than I hoped for) :). It will be interesting to hear how the different sound designers approach this wonderful new synthesizer with it's many tools to choose from.
It's nice to have a place to start(presets) with every new synthesizer but there's nothing more rewarding than coming up with one's own unique sound creation even if they are sometimes edited versions of a preset.
While I have a basic understanding of synthesis I'm basically a knob twister, button pusher, see what happens if I do this kinda guy.
I've just acquired a partially filled synthesizers.com porta 22 modular and the ability to see the signal path going from one module to another is not only fun but highly educational.
I guess that's how the term patches became so widely used in the early days, from people using patch cords to create their sounds.

Yes, I remember auditioning synths in the late 80's and each manufacturer had their own terminology, voices, combi's, presets, patches, programs, partials, etc. :lol:

Jimmy I'm so old Bob Moog was my paperboy! :lol:

Top