Multisample Sample Pools

Post a reply


This question is a means of preventing automated form submissions by spambots.
Smilies
:D :) :( :o :shock: :? 8) :lol: :x :P :oops: :cry: :evil: :twisted: :roll: :wink: :!: :?: :idea: :arrow: :| :mrgreen:

BBCode is ON
[img] is ON
[flash] is OFF
[url] is ON
Smilies are ON

Topic review
   

If you wish to attach one or more files enter the details below.

Maximum filesize per attachment: 25 MiB.

Expand view Topic review: Multisample Sample Pools

Re: Multisample Sample Pools

by amongstmyselves » Wed Jun 07, 2017 7:40 pm

Ha. Sorry for my bad memory John. Maybe something for the next firmware update.

Steve.

Re: Multisample Sample Pools

by John Bowen » Wed Jun 07, 2017 12:08 pm

See comment here: viewtopic.php?f=20&t=16511

Re: Multisample Sample Pools

by amongstmyselves » Mon Jun 05, 2017 8:51 pm

Ah. I've just been through the videos that John made regarding sample playback. It appears that the Solaris will only do multisamples with a limit of 4. This is done by assigning each of the samples to separate osciallators. So the lowkey and hikey values really only limit the range of which a sample will play. It doesn't appear that the Solaris will do actual Multisample playback within one oscillator. Maybe a feature for a future firmware upgrade.

Steve.

Multisample Sample Pools

by amongstmyselves » Mon Jun 05, 2017 12:04 am

Hi all,

Still enjoying the new firmware and have finally come back to looking at the sample playback part of the machine.

I'd like to be able to do multi-sample playback. For those who don't know, this is where a range of keys will play a different sample from the pool. The manual says this can be done by setting the lowkey and hikey values. I have tried this with the wrong outcome. From what I can gather I need to set the sampleindex value to the same for all samples but this doesn't work. The Solaris takes the last sample on the list only. Setting the sampleindex to a unique number for each sample will simply place the sample into a separate wave parameter.

Any hints ?

Cheers,

Steve

Top