Not keen on Preset organising scheme

Post a reply


This question is a means of preventing automated form submissions by spambots.
Smilies
:D :) :( :o :shock: :? 8) :lol: :x :P :oops: :cry: :evil: :twisted: :roll: :wink: :!: :?: :idea: :arrow: :| :mrgreen:

BBCode is ON
[img] is ON
[url] is ON
Smilies are ON

Topic review
   

If you wish to attach one or more files enter the details below.

Maximum filesize per attachment: 25 MiB.

Expand view Topic review: Not keen on Preset organising scheme

Re: Not keen on Preset organising scheme

by sven hauck » Sun Jan 01, 2012 8:39 am

Excellente! Thanks John.

Re: Not keen on Preset organising scheme

by John Bowen » Sun Jan 01, 2012 8:35 am

Sven - please see page 11 in the User Gude, which explains how to do this in the Solaris.

John b.

Re: Not keen on Preset organising scheme

by sven hauck » Sun Jan 01, 2012 6:16 am

serena-5 wrote:I have a great idea, if possible. I'm wondering if it will be possible to organize these patches into groups, like analog, digital, favorites 1,2, etc....possibly even letting you name your different cat agonies. The Virus TI impliments this type of internal organization, which makes it much faster to get around and get to where you need...or get back and forth quickly onstage. By contrast, try to get around between different patches quickly on a Nlord Lead 2x...very difficult indeed. Just something on my want list.....
Great idea!

Re: Not keen on Preset organising scheme

by serena-5 » Thu Dec 29, 2011 6:54 am

Thanks, John. In my zeal to dig in, I only skimmed thru the manual. I'll dig into it this weekend.

Re: Not keen on Preset organising scheme

by John Bowen » Thu Dec 29, 2011 1:15 am

Solaris has two category fields that you can apply to each Preset. See page 11 of the Solaris User Guide for a complete description.

Re: Not keen on Preset organising scheme

by serena-5 » Thu Dec 29, 2011 12:37 am

I have a great idea, if possible. I'm wondering if it will be possible to organize these patches into groups, like analog, digital, favorites 1,2, etc....possibly even letting you name your different cat agonies. The Virus TI impliments this type of internal organization, which makes it much faster to get around and get to where you need...or get back and forth quickly onstage. By contrast, try to get around between different patches quickly on a Nlord Lead 2x...very difficult indeed. Just something on my want list.....

Re: Not keen on Preset organising scheme

by francois » Tue Dec 20, 2011 4:22 pm

Ah, there's hope yet. Good to know, thanks.

Re: Not keen on Preset organising scheme

by John Bowen » Sun Dec 18, 2011 8:37 pm

It requires that I send PsiCraft a spare unit, which I have not been able to do yet, so you could sort of say it is on the ‘back burner’ for now.

Re: Not keen on Preset organising scheme

by francois » Sun Dec 18, 2011 5:25 pm

Good to know. I thought there were discussions with PsiCraft developing something. Is that on the back burner?

Re: Not keen on Preset organising scheme

by John Bowen » Sun Dec 18, 2011 4:28 pm

Yes, a Librarian is needed....there are a couple of possibilities, but at the moment, nothing finished.
I do have a rudimentary Preset Naming program for OS x users...this allows one to view and edit the name of the preset with your Mac computer.
the program is not quite ready for public release, but I can send it out to those who are really wanting to have some way to type in names.

john

Not keen on Preset organising scheme

by francois » Sun Dec 18, 2011 6:53 am

On the one hand, using the CF card to store presets means, potentially, the ability to quickly reorganise banks and presets.

However, the naming scheme used for the presets is not flexible at all. How do I know that p0.pre from Bank0 is preset alpha whilst p0.pre is preset beta in Bank1? Since both are called p0.pre, it is impossible to mix and match presets from various banks. And since it is not possible to name the presets alpha.pre, beta.pre, gamma.pre and so on, we have need for a librarian to organise things!

Top